Most every morning, I begin my day with a quick trip through the headlines to see what has happened in the world while I was sleeping. For most of the last two weeks, every day has provided some new troubling news about the state of affairs in Zimbabwe.
It would be easy to view the ZEC’s delay in publishing the election results as an affront to democracy if we ourselves hadn’t had our own post election squabbles in 2000. The fight over dimpled chads in Florida may have been more transparent and less violent, but a judicially derived outcome to an election is hardly democracy at its finest.
So as the stories of violence, atrocities and man’s inhumanity to man pile up, the question arises: why should I care? Why shouldn’t other people just keep killing themselves. As cruel as it sounds, doesn’t that solve the problem eventually?
It is certainly easier for us to believe in missions or even humanitarian aid when the people we are trying to help appear to be getting along or when they smile for the camera. What keeps us from counting others out when we see mistakes and atrocities repeated and even multiplied?
What can help us to exhibit the eternally compassionate nature of the Almighty in the face of staggering evil?
It stems from how we think about our fellow humans. Ideas do have consequences, and each of us has a basic framework for how to think about the people around us and even ourselves. Are we created, each of us specifically made, or are we simply here as a result of the chance process of evolutionary biology? Do we believe Darwin or traditional Judeo-Christian creation narrative?
My wife recently posited the question in these words:
“…if buy into the idea that humanity is not “created” and therefore “special” in some way, then why must we treat our fellow humans with any dignity? Why shouldn’t I subjugate an entire nation if it allows me to “reach self-actualization”? Why should I respect the rights of vulnerable girls if it allows me to further gratify myself? If humanity progressed through “survival of the fittest” then why shouldn’t I be rejoicing that HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases are wiping out millions of “weak” people? Obviously that leaves more resources for me, the “strong”.
I couldn’t have said it better myself. This is perhaps the most blunt and powerful explanation I have ever heard of how the outworking of Darwinian theory affects every action we take towards our families, our friends, our fellow countrymen and people across the world.
Virtually no one would admit to being the kind of monster that would really hold human life in such low esteem, but often our actions indicate that we really believe in the survival of the fittest. We persist in believing that life is indeed zero-sum, and that having gotten ours, our prerogative as winners is to decide whether we will help the less fortunate or not.
I used to think that indifference was the alternative to benevolence. After reading my wife’s thoughts on the subject, I realized that, taken to its logical extremity, the opposite of benevolence is the alarming words above; rejoicing as millions die.



